Navigating the Next Financial Storm: AI, Debt, and Generational Divides
<video style="width: 100%;height: auto" controls><source src="https://d2qu7nggdaeihr.cloudfront.net/output/8c454979-5f0b-4842-a6dc-b39834a2b0dc-1794497728.mp4" type="video/mp4"></video>
<aside>(This article was generated with AI and it&#8217;s based on a AI-generated transcription of a real talk on stage. While we strive for accuracy, we encourage readers to verify important information.)</aside>
<img decoding="async" src="https://web-summit-engine.imgix.net/tqbql3ducdmdvfjsg3b1ozyir3ab?auto=format&amp;fit=fill&amp;fill=solid&amp;fill-color=white&amp;w=600&amp;h=600&amp;fm=jpg&amp;dl=Adam Kobeissi.jpg" alt="Adam Kobeissi" align="left" hspace="10" width="200" style="float:left;margin-right: 15px">
The Web Summit Lisbon 2026 panel opened with Jensen Huang&#8217;s resignation from Nvidia. Mr. Adam Kobeissi, Founder &amp; Editor-in-Chief of The Kobeissi Letter, called this a &#8220;critical mistake&#8221; but remained bullish on Nvidia and the AI revolution. Professor James Galbraith, Lloyd M. Bentsen, Jr. Chair in Government/Business Relations, suggested corporations outlast founders, limiting long-term impact. Mr. Kobeissi predicted Anthropic&#8217;s imminent IPO would proceed and be oversubscribed, despite a tightening private debt market. Professor Galbraith provided historical context, differentiating past financial crises like 2008 and 1929.

Ms. Pascale Davies, Senior Tech Reporter for Euronews, then addressed record sovereign debt. Mr. Kobeissi highlighted the US situation, where one in five revenue dollars now services debt interest, a substantial increase. He warned central banks&#8217; intervention capabilities are diminishing, with the bond market demanding higher compensation for risk amidst persistent inflation, leading to a &#8220;100% chance of bankruptcy in the long run.&#8221; Professor Galbraith challenged this, arguing 20th-century economic tools could manage instability, attributing inaction to a &#8220;fear of public debt&#8221; and &#8220;inflation.&#8221;

Professor Galbraith&#8217;s primary concern was political paralysis in the US, hindering a unified crisis response. He suggested the current situation could resemble 2000&#8217;s &#8220;overbuilding&#8221; crisis or 1929, where new technology undercuts existing ones. Mr. Kobeissi underscored severe economic challenges for the younger generation: average first-time homebuyer age of 40, 8% mortgage rates, and $1.3 trillion in student loan debt. He noted a growing sentiment among young Americans that the system is &#8220;broken for them,&#8221; fostering socialist leanings.

This, coupled with a broadening &#8220;K-shaped economy&#8221; dividing asset owners from non-asset owners, poses a catastrophic societal risk if the youngest demographic feels unable to achieve prosperity. Regarding the timing of the next crisis, Mr. Kobeissi did not foresee an &#8220;imminent 2008 type moment,&#8221; citing well-capitalized banks and different housing market dynamics. He viewed a systemic crisis as a long-term trend, materializing over 10-20 years, acknowledging that full preparedness is impossible due to inherent unpredictability.

Mr. Kobeissi noted that risk has shifted from traditional banks to new ecosystem players, like AI companies leveraging private debt markets. Professor Galbraith framed the global economic future as a contest between the American system&#8217;s rapid financing and technological legacy, and China&#8217;s stable development, industrial strength, and cost efficiency. He tentatively placed his bet on China, citing its energy strategy and competitive advantages. Mr. Kobeissi, however, remained bullish on the US, believing it would lead the AI race and ultimately prevail.

Both experts concluded that the next major economic shift might be driven by technological competition, where &#8220;creative destruction&#8221; will both create new value and dismantle existing economic structures. This fundamental lesson, often omitted from conventional economic thought, highlights the unpredictable and transformative nature of future economic challenges, emphasizing the need for adaptable strategies and a clear understanding of global competitive dynamics.

The next financial crisis: Are we ready for what’s coming?

Chinamaxxing: The new era of Made in China

Closing remarks